Home » Ultra Running » Shorting a Race
IMG_0931 - Copy

Shorting a Race

IMG_0931 - CopyThis is a subject that is near and dear to my heart. Some Ultra Races have multiple distances, if you start at the same time, should you be able to bale at the 25K turnaround and still get a finishing time. Or at the 50K turn around? I say no. If you signed up for a 50k and you run a 25k, you should get a DNF.  Call me old school but I think that’s what is right for our sport. Eric Schranze in the following article from Ultra Runner Podcast  agrees.

 

Shorting a Race

I got this from the RD of Headlands Hundred, an event I’m running on Saturday:

You risk a DNF if you change distances after the race start. For example, if you are registered for the 100 Mile distance and stop after 50 miles, you do not get an official time for 50 miles but rather a DNF for the 100 mile run.

One of my favorite aspects of this sport is the perseverance and mental toughness it takes to complete the events, whether it be from a runner new to the distance or a grizzled veteran. I respect RDs and events that make entrants stick to their original distance and think it benefits the entire community when they do.

There are many races that allow runners to opt out of the event they signed up for, but still receive credit for running the shorter distance. This is disappointing on a few levels.

First, it puts a tremendous amount of doubt and hesitation in the runner’s head that if they’re going through a bad spot in their hundred, they can always quit and take credit for a fifty. It’s hard enough running past a turnaround for a shorter distance, without compounding it by giving the runners an excuse to bail. “Well, if I can’t do the hundred, I’ll just do the fifty” is not a good attitude to have going into a long race.

Further, allowing runners to enter one race, but finish another, screws up the competitive nature of each. Fine, many people don’t run to compete with others, but some of us do–even if we’re mid packers.

Say you’re running a fifty and your goal is to finish in the top ten. You work your butt off, hit your hydration and nutrition goals, count runners coming back on the out and back or ask aid station volunteers where you are in the standing. You’ve chased down the guy in front of you and fought hard to hold him off from behind. You’ve got this. Sure, you want to finish, but you really want to hit top ten. Elated and sore, you cross the finish line a few minutes behind #9 only to find out that a 100mile runner “wasn’t having his day” so dropped after half way and displaced your standing. Bummer, huh?

It comes down to completing what you said you were going to complete. Getting (not earning) a finish for a fifty when you actually quit a hundred doesn’t make a bit of sense and devalues the efforts of those who pushed through the shorter distance to get to the finish line.

If you’re unsure of how far you want to go or have hesitation if you’ll be able to make the distance, there are some awesome timed events out there and I’d urge you to check them out.

Am I off base?

Disagree with me?

Make the case!

So what do you think, do you agree with me or should runners have options after they have committed to a distance?

One comment

  1. I totally agree. No matter what distance I’ve signed up for that is what I need to finish and I don’t finish until I hit that finish line with the amount of miles I signed up for. You can also look at it financially. I paid good money to run a race, I’m going to get my money out of it. Plus the organizer planned for a certain amount of racers on that course so you are using resources that was planned for fewer races.

    If you are having a bad race suck it up and take the DNF. Train harder for next time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>